The Myers CPA
Investment Letter 2017
Sensible advice for self-directed
investment portfolios
Forecast for 2017 … the
crushing consensus on the equity side … the S&P 500 will end next year up another
5 percent gain from today’s level, according to the median forecast of analysts
… FT 12/5/16
Vanguard: The investment environment for the next five
years may prove more challenging than the previous five, underscoring the need
for discipline, reasonable expectations, and low-cost strategies…Stocks.
After several years of suggesting that low economic growth need not equate with
poor equity returns, our medium-run outlook for global equities remains guarded
in the 5%–7% range.
TREND LINE: The dashed trend line of 6.3% is the US
equity rate of return since 1801 and this rate has been remarkably consistent
over 30- to 50-year time frames ever since (the 6.3% graph is adjusted for
dividend reinvestment to be comparable to the S&P 500 basic index).
Best commentary for 2017.
Trumponomics will
set the pace for market uncertainty in 2017 with policy shifts casting a long
shadow, warns Allianz’s Mohamed El-Erian.
Four macro themes
will dominate the coming year, monetary policy detaching from data dependency,
uneven global policy rebalancing, the risk of an over-strong dollar and dealing
with the anti-establishment surge.
“Investors
would be well advised to book some profits while also rebalancing some of their
remaining risk exposures in favour of sectors that have lagged behind (such as
traditional tech), and also to emerging markets with strong balance sheets,
limited currency mismatches and sound management.” -
Mohamed El-Erian, FT, 1/8/2017
Worried about Trump? Don’t try “to time” the market because
evidence shows it cannot be done. The big drawback: most “timers” miss
the rebound where the significant gains are made. Experience with 2008-09 shows
that well-diversified portfolios weather just about anything short of an
overthrow of the government. The reinvestment of dividends is key—you
don’t want to miss out on this often overlooked feature. Dividend reinvestment ensures
the investor is buying additional shares during a downturn at a substantial
discount—this gives a big kick to long-run performance. Exceptional returns occur
when the market recovery gets underway—as it always does. The Wall Street
homily is correct: the money is in the
holding, not the trading.
Recommendation. Keep portfolios well diversified. One strategy is to balance into
thirds:
·
Income:
bonds, public utility ETFs, and high-dividend yield equity funds.
·
Balanced
funds: Wellington Fund and/or Wellesley Fund (these are both balanced funds of
blue chip stocks and bonds).
·
Growth:
broad-based stock index funds like the S&P 500 fund and broad-based international
equity funds like the Vanguard World Fund (which is also a good dividend payer).
Long View. There are 4 billion people working in the advanced and advancing
economies and this number is growing every year. Having investments that are
tied to cash income from this vast amount of work through dividends means you
are using the compound-interest law to build an ever-larger stake in the
ever-larger future world gross income. (Which is why you don’t want to see your
future wealth “fried” by adverse climate change from global warming! You
personally might think “national” but your investments are very international.)
Vanguard Funds 12/31/16
Name of Vanguard
fund
|
Fund
Number
|
Current yield
|
1-yr
|
5-yr
|
10-yr
|
GNMA bond fund
|
0036
|
2.07
|
1.84
|
1.95
|
4.36
|
Intermediate Term Corp bond
|
1946
|
3.48
|
5.03
|
4.50
|
-
|
REIT index fund
|
0123
|
3.98
|
8.50
|
11.78
|
5.23
|
Wellesley Income
|
0027
|
2.64
|
8.08
|
7.29
|
6.66
|
Wellington fund
|
0021
|
2.37
|
11.01
|
10.44
|
6.89
|
S&P
500 Index fund
|
0040
|
2.11
|
11.93
|
14.62
|
6..94
|
US Hi-Dividend yield
|
0623
|
3.04
|
16.75
|
14.23
|
7.02
|
Small-Cap Value Index
|
0860
|
1.85
|
24.78
|
16.36
|
-
|
Emerging Market index
|
0533
|
1.70
|
11.73
|
1.44
|
1.87
|
Emerging Market Select
|
0752
|
1.44
|
16.86
|
2.74
|
-
|
Total Intl Hi Dividend yield
|
0530
|
2.35
|
12.03
|
-
|
-
|
Total World Stock index
|
0628
|
2.14
|
8.67
|
9.74
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ETFs
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intermediate Term Corp bond
|
VCIT
|
3.48
|
5.27
|
4.40
|
-
|
US Hi Dividend yield
|
VYM
|
3.12
|
16.89
|
14.31
|
7.14
|
Total US Stock Mkt
|
VTI
|
1.97
|
12.74
|
14.64
|
7.23
|
Total Intl Hi Dividend yield
|
VYMI
|
2.40
|
15.75
|
-
|
-
|
Total World Stock Mkt (incl
US)
|
VT
|
2.30
|
8.47
|
9.73
|
|
Utilities ETF
|
VPU
|
3.55
|
17.56
|
10.71
|
7.10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
Vanguard Emerging Market Select fund,
which is a managed fund, did quite well compared to the comparable index fund,
which suggests that stock picking in the emerging market world does pay off. Both
the US Hi-Dividend Yield fund and the International Hi-Dividend Yield fund have
done well and from a defensive point of view have relatively low weights in
banks and are “choosy” in the banks they have included in the portfolios. The
International Hi-Dividend fund includes Toyota, Taiwan Semiconductor and
similar international multinational heavyweights. Mostly Canadian and
Australian banks; Vanguard has wisely avoided large positions in European
banks. Both funds should be relatively strong in an overall downturn.
The
S&P 500 Index for year 2016 came
in at 10.77% increase (The Vanguard S&P500 index fund came in 11.93% with
dividends less management fee).
Schwab Intelligent Portfolios. Like many of my clients, I have several brokerage accounts as a matter
of safety and diversification including one at Charles Schwab. At the beginning
of 2016, I set up a Roth IRA at Schwab using their intelligent portfolio
service. I filled out a risk profile indicating medium-high tolerance for risk
around a wealth-building long-term goal. The program then selects and manages a
portfolio of mostly Schwab ETFs (exchange traded funds which are very similar
to mutual funds). The portfolio beat the Vanguard S&P 500 Index fund
by 2.8% in 2016 (and 2.0% over the US Total Stock Market ETF) – a remarkable
result.
How does it work? You open a Portfolio account, put money in
(no transfer of securities), fill out the risk profile, and the artificial
intelligence-based portfolio management makes a selection of ETFs, The IP
program will periodically buy and sell as its assessment of relative values and
the markets changes, but these were rare. It mostly holds (so far).
What does it cost? Nothing! (Schwab makes its money on the very modest
management fee in the ETFs.) Frictionless, no commissions on the trades.
Key point. The intelligent portfolio artificial intelligence program is expert
at making sophisticated relative value judgments based on deep data across the
entire universe of publicly traded securities – worldwide and going back
decades. It is unlikely human beings can match this level of judgment. Human
managers can only outwit the computer when there is “something” not in the
price (probably).
Below
is a profile of the portfolio and the rates of return of the individual ETFs
and their percentage allocation in the portfolio. Fund type FUND indicates a
fundamental index is used as the measuring/guiding index. These indices are
based on a composite of sales, profits, cash flow, etc, and are believed to be
more stable and consistent indices than market capitalization indices which
overweight “winners” at the top of a market cycle. Schwab is a specialist in
fundamental ETF index funds. Approximately 53% of the portfolio is in
fundamental index funds. So when fundamental indices are out-performing market
cap indices, one can expect the IP account to do well. And I would expect
fundamental indices to do well in a major downturn – very defensive.
The
program also selects some investments that I for one would not normally chose,
such as Gold, US Corporate High Yield Bonds, and Emerging Market Local Currency
Bonds. Not obvious, but very intriguing once you think about it. (I’ve got a
smart guy with wide-angle vision on my side!)
|
|
|
|
|
Region
|
Name
|
Fund Type
|
Rate of return
|
% allocation
|
US
|
REIT
|
|
5.45
|
2.70
|
|
LARGE CAP
|
FUND
|
19.09
|
14.19
|
|
SMALL CAP
|
FUND
|
29.41
|
17.64
|
|
LARGE CAP
|
|
13.38
|
10.53
|
|
SMALL CAP
|
|
25.98
|
5.67
|
|
|
|
|
50.73
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INTL
|
EMERG MKTS
|
|
19.18
|
3.98
|
|
EMERG MKTS
|
FUND
|
39.85
|
5.67
|
|
LARGE CAP
|
FUND
|
11.95
|
9.59
|
|
SMALL CAP
|
FUND
|
12.66
|
5.61
|
|
ALL CAP
|
|
5.78
|
6.93
|
|
SMALL CAP
|
|
6.48
|
3.45
|
|
|
|
|
35.23
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER
|
GOLD
|
|
4.35
|
4.09
|
OTHER BOND
|
CORP HI YLD
|
|
6.98
|
4.99
|
OTH BOND INTL
|
EM LOC CURR
|
|
5.53
|
5.57
|
OTHER INTL
|
VAN INTL REIT
|
|
1.97
|
1.96
|
|
|
|
|
16.61
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
14.73
|
100.00
|
Vanguard ETF Portfolio Selection Tool. Vanguard has a similar service except that
it provides you a portfolio recommendation and then you go buy the ETFs in your
Vanguard brokerage account or the new combined account. It doesn’t “hands off”
manage the portfolio. With a similar risk profile as I used with Schwab,
Vanguard came up with:
Fund name
|
Symbol
|
% Allocation
|
Rate of return %
|
|
Total Stock Mkt
|
VTI
|
42
|
12.74
|
|
Total Intl Stock
|
VXUS
|
28
|
4.71
|
|
Tot Bond Fund US
|
BND
|
21
|
2.54
|
|
Intl Bond Fund
|
BNDX
|
9
|
4.63
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
Comment: This is a little too “bond heavy” for me. I would substitute VPU (the
Utilities ETF) for about half the Bond Fund (say 11%). The International Stock
fund lagged the Schwab choices mostly because this Vanguard fund is heavier on
Europe and lighter on emerging markets than Schwab (and so “safer”).
Vanguard Economic Forecast
In Vanguard's latest
economic and investment outlook, we discuss why the current low-growth,
low-rate environment is not primarily the result of cyclically weak demand or
secular stagnation. Instead, we believe the modest global recovery since the
Great Recession is explained more by the intersection of three long-term,
supply-side forces: weakening demographics, expanding globalization, and
advancing technology.
Looking at the
longer term, our long-held estimate of 2% U.S. trend growth is neither
"new" nor "subpar" when accounting for lower population
growth and excluding the debt-fueled boost to growth between 1980 and the
Global Financial Crisis. Beyond the United States, we see a backdrop of
"sustained fragility" for global trade and manufacturing, as the
years ahead will present a series of risks that vary across economies.
Given
our economic outlook, we project that portfolio returns will be modest
across all asset allocations when compared with the heady returns
experienced since the depths of the Global Financial Crisis. This guarded but
not bearish outlook is unlikely to change until we see a combination of higher
short-term rates and more favorable valuation metrics. In some ways, the
investment environment for the next five years may prove more challenging than
the previous five, underscoring the need for discipline, reasonable return
expectations, and low-cost strategies.
Other voices – powering up US economic growth
will be harder than it looks for the Trump administration
Protectionism,
anemic saving, and deficit spending make for an especially toxic cocktail. Under Trumponomics, it will be exceedingly
difficult to make America great again … Donald Trump’s economic strategy is
severely flawed. The US president-elect wants to restore growth via deficit
spending in a country with a chronic shortfall of saving. This points to a
further compression in national saving, making a widening of an already outsize
trade gap all but inevitable … That dynamic unmasks the Achilles’ heel of
Trumponomics: a blatant protectionist bias that collides head-on with America’s
inescapable reliance on foreign saving and trade deficits to sustain economic
growth. – Stephen S. Roach, Project Syndicate 11/24/2016
The upside. Fiscal
policy will be highly stimulative, drawing down on the global savings glut,
pushing up growth and real interest rates everywhere. It will feel good for
a while, and then the financial strains will emerge [large trade deficits
and large federal deficits and increasing debt], and then Dr Doom can make his
untimely entrance. – Markets Insight, FT 11/24/2016
China – someday this dog will bite! But
probably not this year.
The dimensions of
China’s liquidity splurge are startling. Ousmène Jacques Mandeng, formerly with
the International Monetary Fund, has calculated that between 2007 and 2015
China created 63 per cent, or $16.1tn, of the growth in the world’s supply of
money. China now has more money coursing through the arteries of its economy
than the eurozone and Japan combined — and almost as much as the US and the
eurozone combined.
…
In his analysis, China’s crunch point will come when there is a disruption
in the supply of money needed to pay total debts that amount to about 250
per cent of China’s gross domestic product, the highest level among any large
emerging market.
-
FT
12/2/16
And
does he understand that China’s private debt bubble is a powder keg under
the global economy? … Today, China’s credit boom is underpinned by
collateral almost as bad as that on which Bear Stearns, Lehman Brothers, and
the rest were relying in 2007. – Yanis
Varoufakis, Project Syndicate 12/4/16
Vanguard and its market success
“Vanguard
has topped a table of the bestselling fund managers globally for 2016 after
drawing nearly $200bn from investors, eclipsing the total amount of new money
raised by its 10 nearest competitors.” FT 1/9/2017